Sul sito www.anandtech.com è stata pubblicata una comparativa tra schede grafiche utilizzando come benchmark Unreal Tournament 2003 performance test.

Le schede video comparate sono le seguenti:


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600 (128MB)
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400 (128MB)
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 (128MB)
ATI Radeon 8500 (128MB)
ATI Radeon 8500 (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 (64MB)
Matrox Parhelia (128MB)
ATI Radeon 8500LE (128MB)
NVIDIA GeForce3 (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460 (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (64MB)
ATI Radeon 7500 (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (64MB)
ST Micro Kyro II (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce2 Pro (64MB)
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 (32MB)
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 (32MB)

Qui sotto vi riportiamo un estratto delle conclusioni tratte da anandtech.com:

What have we learned from the hours of endless benchmarking? For starters, the GeForce4 was definitely a wise investment for anyone that has already purchased one. Current GeForce4 owners can rest assured that their cards will be able to play the next-generation of FPSes perfectly at very high frame rates. However, we'd caution anyone looking to upgrade in the coming months; ATI's R300 is on the horizon and, from what we're hearing, will be a formidable opponent to the GeForce4 Ti 4600. Then there's the elusive NV30, provided that it does ship on time by the end of this year we'll be seeing some impressive scores from the NVIDIA camp as well.
Per visualizzare la comparativa:
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1647&p=1